The Landrys of Old Acadia.
by Peter Landry.1
Introduction:
My objective is to list all the male Landrys that ever lived during a hundred period (1640-1740) in Old Acadia.2
Old Acadia might easily be outlined on a map of modern day Nova Scotia, an eastern province of Canada. The original territory of Acadia was fully contained within peninsular Nova Scotia towards its north-western end; its shores being washed by the eastern waters of the Bay of Fundy.3 These shores would include those of the Annapolis Basin; Minas Basin; and Chignecto Bay with its further extensions, Shepody Bay and Cumberland Basin.
Old Acadia was one of the first European settlements in North America. The area was likely explored by European fishermen, many, many years ago; but the first settlers, who overwintered, came in 1605, viz., when French merchants sent Monsieur de Monts out with a small crew of Frenchmen. The first French family immigration took place around the year of 1636; such immigration was not extensive and pretty much came to an end by 1671. From this small population base arose the French Acadian population; which, by 1671, consisted of three hundred and sixty one; and which, by 1750, had grown to some twelve thousand4 -- unassisted and mostly ungoverned. Because of international conflict, the Acadians, both by the actions of the French and English authorities, were, in the end (1748-1763), driven from their ancestral lands to all corners of the western hemisphere. This distinct French population, the Acadians, in addition to the normal trials and tribulations of living on the New World frontier, had a special set of miseries; for, during many of the years when they lived in Old Acadia, war raged and battles were fought all around them. There were the attacks and pillage of Sedgwick (1654), Phips (1690), Church (1704), and March (1707); there was the bloody struggles for power among the local French barons, such as, La Tour and Denys; there were the impositions of the Catholic Church and certain of their blood thirsty priests (e.g., Le Loutre). The Acadian people -- and all the evidence is that they are a gentle family loving group of people -- during their first three generations in their American lands, bore witness to more battles then one would think could ever possibly be staged over a 150 year period. International armies of men, some large; both regimented and otherwise, consisting of three races of men (two at a distinct stage of their civilization process) came clashing together in historic battles which took place near the war's end: Canso (1744), Grande Pré (1747), St. Croix River (1750), Louisbourg (1745 & 1758), and Chignecto (1755). These bloody battles unfolded on Acadian territory.
Through this 100 year, plus, period, the French Acadian population grew and expanded. Beginning in 1680, parts of it moved up the bay. First to the Minas Basin: Grand Pré, rivière-des-Habitants, rivière-aux-Canard, Pisiguit (Windsor), Cobequit (Truro); then up and around into Shepody Bay and Cumberland Basin (Beaubassin); out and across the isthmus of Chignecto; and to thin out along the southwestern shores of the Northumberland Strait.
Through this period, and in spite of the military turmoil (which they only rarely joined in on), the Acadians made their living by seasonally farming the fertile lands which exist where the Fundy has her influence. Such a bonded group had never before come about, except for ancient times; the climatic elements and the cruelty of political men had the effect of welding and tempering, over three or four generations, a most unique social group. They thrived on their beliefs in family and in religion. These same beliefs, however, led to the breakup of Old Acadia. At war with the French nation, the local British authorities thought they could no longer afford to have people on "British territory" who led their lives in such a French/Catholic way. The British, thinking they had no choice, wanted to get rid of them; to send them south, to be dispersed and diluted amongst the English speaking people in their colonies, south, along the Atlantic seaboard. And, so, these simple French peasants were forcibly ripped away from their ancestral homes. It happened during the years 1755-1760: these French Acadians were, against their will, driven out of their lands and herded onto vile transport ships. Families were splintered and shipped hundreds, indeed, thousands of miles away from their lands and their homes; and, in many instances, away from one another. After wasting away on ill provisioned ships, for weeks and months, they were herded off again onto foreign shores and into entirely different cultures; to places where people could not speak the French language, who did not understand them (and therefore feared them), and, who, in any event, had their own problems and did not care much for the plight of these deserted French people who fortune had cast upon them.
Your author/compiler is a Landry. I am privileged to state that the Landry family was one of the first families to come to Acadia around the year 1640. Within a generation or two the Landry family spread out to all of the above noted areas which constitute Old Acadia.
Numbering System:
Before starting this Landry Genealogy I am obliged to say a word about my numbering system. Getting all the information herein, down in one spot, as you might well imagine, at times, became a very confusing project.5 Out of necessity, I had to pin a unique number on each individual that I was able to identify from the records. This number, in itself will depart significant information. [#1] is René Landry, who came to Old Acadia around 1640. His sons will carry two digits; his grandsons, three; and so on. Thus, just from the number -- for example [#1124], Benjamin -- we can tell that Benjamin is the fourth generation down from René [#1]; Benjamin's father was [#112], his grandfather [#11], and his great grandfather, the grand patriarch, was René [#1].
[1] Peter Landry is a lawyer and has been, for 20 years, in private practice in the City of Dartmouth. He invites correspondence on the topic and may be contacted at P.O. Box 1200, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, B2Y 4B8; or at blu_pete&fox.nstn.ca.
[2] Such a list would therefore include all the male adults which were rounded up and deported by the British from peninsular Nova Scotia during the year, 1755. I should say, at this point that the Landry name, as an Acadian name, is born by numerous descendants of the old Acadians of Nova Scotia. (Other names, most numerous, would be LeBlanc, Hebert, Boudrot, and Richard.)
[3] This bay (not a gulf) of the Atlantic Ocean, is the largest sheltering bay one will find along the entire eastern coast of the North American continent.
[4] Hannay, p. 407; see also, Brebner's New England's Outpost: Acadia before the Conquest, p. 165.
[5] I am not a genealogist: I am, however, a lawyer who has done, in connection with a private legal practice, a fair share of legal research and all of that which such research entails; I have, too, as a court lawyer, been obliged through the years to weigh up and contrast documentary evidence of all kinds. An invaluable source to anyone who is interested in Acadian genealogy, is, the multi-volumed work of Bona Arsenault (1903-93). Arsenault sets forth short notes on every Acadian that ever existed prior to 1755, at least it would appear so. In this, my work, "The Landrys of Old Acadia," I have borrowed extensively from Arsenault. If my information needs to be checked then one should first go to Arsenault; then, secondly, to the other sources as I have cited.
[6] René Landry [#1], is written up by Arsenault (p. 612), by Stanley (A Man for Two Peoples, pp. 5-6) and by Jehn, Acadian Descendants (1972) (Jehn#1), p. 118). The information I set forth for René [#1], unless it carries a note, is common to all these three authors. René [#11], who follows along in my genealogy, has proven, in relationship to [#1], to be a bit of a mystery. I have determined that [#11] is the oldest son of [#1]. However, Arsenault thinks him to be a nephew of [#1] and says [#11] was born in 1634. After pointing out that another genealogist thought [#11] was the brother of [#1], Stanley seems to come to no conclusions. I have accepted Jehn's position, viz., that [#11] was born in 1640 and is the son of [#1].
[7A] Loudun is 60 km south-west of Tours. Tours, as can be seen from a map of France, is located on the beautiful Loire, a French river rich both in grape vines and regal history. Loudun, to give a further directional fix, is but 20 km south from Candes, a small community located in one of the south pointing elbows of the many elbows of the Loire. The French Canadian and Acadian Genealogical Review (FCAGR), p. 56, says, that there is an "ancient parish," "Saint-jean d'Angely," where, in the registers, will be found "a goodly number of Acadian names," including: Babin, Bourgeois, Brun, Daigre, Dousset, Dugas, Godet, Landry, LeBlanc, Martin, Richard, etc.
[7B] The information on René Landry's father and mother comes from Shirley Burke (rbc@nbnet.nb.ca) who wrote me during May of 1997, and who cited Histoire a Genealogie des Acadiens Grand-Pre in a footnote on p. 624. In the 1678 census of Port Royal there is listed "Marie Sale, widow of Jean Claude." Also, in the 1686 census will be found, "Marie Sale." In 1678 Marie is seemingly listed with the Bourg family; but, in 1686, she is listed between two Landry families one being Rene[#2]. Now, if indeed, Marie Sale is René's [#1] mother, then one might conclude that there was an extended family of Landrys which arrived in Acadia.
[8] No direct evidence has yet to be discovered as to when the first Landry, René Landry came to Acadia, or under whose auspices he came, I have concluded that it had to be between the years 1638-1650. It is likely that René Landry came as a result of the recruiting efforts of the agents of either Isaac de Razilly and/or Charles de Menou D'Aulnay, more likely under D'Aulnay. To begin with d'Aulnay was of a French noble family who had the seigneury of Aulnay (Château de Charnisay) which is located near Louden, the place from which Landry and a number of the original Acadians hailed. Further, it was only d'Aulnay, in continuing with the original efforts of Razilly, who made any kind of a colonization effort during this period of history (for that matter, at any period during the history of Acadia). "He [d'Aulnay] fetched some 20 families from France ... his rivals [La Tour] were almost entirely concerned with trade, d'Aulnay's ambition was to establish a lasting colony." (DCB, vol., pp. 505-6.) I am now (May of 1997) in a position to update this note as a result of some field work, some very pleasant field work. In April of 1997, Margo and I travelled to France and found our way down to a place just south of Loudun and visited the villages of Angliers, Martaizé, Aulnay, and la Chausée. It was at la Chausée where we discovered an Acadian museum that the local people maintain, Maison de l'Acadie. This small little museum does an admirable job of retracing the steps of the original Acadian families that, by and large, during the mid 17th century, came from this very small area of France. The highlight of our trip was to discover the stone church of la Chausée, just in behind Maison de l'Acadie; it was the church, we discovered with delight, in which René Landry and Perrine Bourg stood before the altar and took their marriage vows on the 15th of April, 1638. The very friendly French lady in charge of the museum, Mme. Yvette Chauser, further advised, with conviction, that this young French couple, after a further church service during which the entire community wished them well, in the year 1642, traveled out of the community to the coast, with others, to board the ship which was to bring them to the new world, which was to become known as Acadia.
[9] "Genealogy and Emigration," (FCAGR), vol. I, no. 1 (Spring 1968), p. 66.
[10] Ibid., pp. 59-66.
[11] See "Fort Sainte-Marie-de-Grace, LaHave, Nova Scotia: 350 Years of History," NSHR, 2:2(1982), p. 54.
[12] Though Arsenault says 1645 and Jehn#1, 1639; an on site visit, satisfies me that they were married at la Chausée on the 15th of April, 1638. (See FN #8.)
[13] See Jehn#1, p. 118. Arsenault (p. 612) does not mention René[#11], but confirms the other two sons, Pierre[#116] and Claude[#111].
[14] Personally, I can trace my direct line back through Jean [#112].
[15] Stephen White, "Acadian Family Names" (Moncton: Acadian Odyssey, 1992).
[16] Info. taken from Canadian Archives Report of 1906 (Ottawa: Dawson, 1906, Part I.) unless indicated otherwise and see Arsenault, p. 1206.
[17] During August and September of 1758, British naval ships raid French villages right up to the Gaspé coast; 3540 French people are taken off of Isle St. Jean (Prince Edward Island) and deported to France. Wolfe reports to Amherst: "We have done a great deal of mischief; spread the terror of his majesty's arms through the whole gulf, but added nothing to the reputation of them." (As quoted by Savary in his Supplement, History of the County of Annapolis, p. 30.)
[18] Arsenault, in dealing with René [#1112], at p. 1201, does not list Prosper [#11125], but at p. 1207 says that Prosper [#11125] was likely the son of René [#1112].
[19] NSHS, vol. 3 (1883), "Winslow's Journal ...", p. 117.
[20] In addition to Arsenault (p. 1207) see CAR, op. cit., Part I. p. 113.
[21] In addition to Arsenault, ibid.; see CAR, op. cit., Part I. p. 98.
[22] Arsenault and CAR, ibid.
[23] Arsenault deals with one of the children, Basile (b. 1750), at p. 2524; Basile lived at CÔte-Gelée (Louisiana?).
[24] NSHS, vol. 3 (1883), "Winslow's Journal ...", p. 117.
[25] Arsenault seems to deal with some of Joseph's descendents at pp. 2523-4.
[26] A note on the Melansons: On the 1671 census (available on microfilm) we see that there were two Melansons, Pierre and Charles. It is interesting to note that the Melanson brothers were not French. They were of Scottish descent! Little is known about this early Scottish settlement. Calnek says that this settlement consisted of 70 families and it lasted about ten years; but this information is wrong and was corrected by Judge Savary. In March of 1628, Sir William's son (Sir William), "having been knighted and made Knight Admiral, started with a fleet of four vessels containing seventy men and two women" reached Port Royal. During the first winter, so ill prepared they were, thirty of the seventy died of "scurvy and other diseases. The remainder of them, unprotected by the presence of Latour and receiving no aid from home, were attacked by the Indians and fell victim to the scalping knife and the ravages of want and sickness, with the exception of one family, two members of which were living in 1635, having become Roman Catholics and married French wives." (Savary's Supplement, History of the County of Annapolis, pp. 6-7.) There is reference to Cecille as a babe of 6 mos. (father, Charles Melanson & mother, Marie Dugast) in the 1671 census of Port Royal. (See CAR, op. cit., Appendix 'A', Part III, p. 1.) Arsenault says (p. 1401) "fille de Pierre [b.1632] et de Marguerite Mius d'Entremont, de Port Royal. (See also fn at pp. 9-10, Savary.) While I am at it - tying to impress you with my personal ancestry; a weakness of those interested in genealogy - I should quote Hannay, p. 206: "La Tour had five children by his second wife, Madame Charnisay [d'Aulnay], viz., Marie, born in 1654, and married to Alexander Le Borge de Belleisle; Jacques, born in 1661, married to Anne Melancon; Charles, born in 1664: Anne, also born in 1664, married to Jacques Muis, sieur de Poubomcou; Marguerite, born in 1665, married to Abraham Muis. The D'Entrements, who are still numerous in the western part of Nova Scotia, are, many of them, the descendents of Anne and Marguerite La Tour. There are several other families, both in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, that have some of the blood of La tour in their veins, such as the Girourds, Portiers and Landrys."
[27] Duncanson, Newport, Nova Scotia, p. 1.
[28] See CAR, op. cit., Appendix 'B', Part III, pp. 72-5. I should say, too, there was a number of other Landrys that show up as signatories, including: "Claude," "Pierre," and "Baptiste." Certain other Landrys were signing for the Annapolis River region: "Joseph" and "François." (See CAR, op. cit., Appendix 'B', Part III, pp. 77-81.) There were among the 600 plus signatories approximately 40 Landrys. Some of the names are very familiar and we might conclude that the following identified Landrys signed the Oath of Allegiance: Pierre Landry, age 72; Jean, age 64; Jean, age 40; Benjamin, age 32; Abraham, age 30: but that leaves 35 others. Of these 35 other names, some, I believe, are duplicated; and, maybe the younger ones (Jean Baptiste, age 15; Joseph, age 14; François, age 12; and Alex, age 7) were also asked to sign -- possible, since I think the underlings to the English governor, Philipps, were real anxious to get names down on paper. For example, while I have identified Pierre, age 72, six more Pierres appear -- could there have been that many Pierres in Acadia at this time? Same can be said for other familiar names such as René and Jean. However, some different names arise, such as, for example, Paul, Germain (le vieux), and Jermain. (Many of these different names show up on a petition signed at Boston in 1764 [CAR, op. cit., , Appendix 'B', Part III, pp. 90-1].)
[29] In addition to seeing Arsenault (p. 1402 & p. 2241), see CAR, op. cit., , Part I. p. 35.
[30] Falmouth, Ch. II, p. 6. The year given is 1754; but by this time, Jean, having moved there in 1751, was to be found in Cape Breton.
[31] For the course of this Landry branch, I direct the reader to another document of mine, "The Landrys of Cape Breton." The information that I have of this family's immigration to Cape Breton is solid, but I am obliged to point out that there was a Jean Landry with wife, Margrite (with two sons and six daughters) who were at Boston in August of 1763. (CAR, op. cit., , Appendix 'B', Part III, pp. 134-7.) I have not been able to fit this piece of information into this genealogy.
[32] The question arises - Why did certain of the Old Acadian families flee before 1755, as quite a number did during the years 1749-51. There is no simple answer. But for the Jean Baptiste family, my direct ancestors, I think I know why. I digress, but let me give to you my theory. I now tell of the battle at St Croix River. In 1744, John Gorham (1709-1751) of Massachusetts arrived with "fifty picked Indians," Mohawks of the Finger Lakes; they had arrived in Nova Scotia to help the British deal with the French and Indian problem. "Gorham's Rangers" had an immediate impact and the siege at Annapolis Royal which had been going on at the time; it was lifted. Gorham's rangers were an offensive lot of men and they knew exactly how to apply frontier techniques to their benefit. They were to make a lasting impression and were to become much hated by the French and the local Indians. Gorham was at Louisbourg in 1745 when the New Englanders successfully took the place. During the next few years Gorham continued to extend and entrench the British presence in Nova Scotia by establishing several blockhouses at various strategic points, including Cobequid (Truro) and Chignecto. Late in 1746 he marched with Noble and the 500 New England men who moved in that winter and to occupy the French homes at Grand Pré. (Gorham had left Noble, in January of 1747, by just two days, when the French regulars, having made a brilliant cross-country winter march, attacked and overtook the larger English force; killing, in the process, a number of Englishmen, including Noble -- in the body of my larger work I tell of the Bloody Battle of Grand Pré.) During March of 1750, Cornwallis, the Governor of Nova Scotia who had established himself at the newly founded post at Halifax in 1749, sent Gorham and 60 of his Rangers from their roost at Fort Sackville to Pisiquid (Windsor) with orders to station himself there at that place. On March 18th, 1750, two days out on their March over the cart path that existed between Chebucto and Pisiquid, they come to the fording place on the St Croix River. At this place, they met up with a large number of MicMac Indians, who, apparently were there lying in wait for them; a battle broke out. "A saw mill and two houses on the Halifax side of the river were commandeered, and for three days, Gorham fought a defensive action. As soon as the superior numerical advantage of the Indians became apparent, a messenger was sent post haste back to Fort Sackville for reinforcements. He made the 28 mile trip through the woods in eight hours." British regulars hauling two field pieces came to Gorham's aid and on their arrival the Indians melted back into the woods; the group proceed to Piziquid unmolested. On arrival Gorham "established himself on an eminence between the Piziquid and St. Croix, and commenced the erection of Fort Edward ..." (Hannay, p. 363.) It is my theory that the saw mill and two houses which these rough men commandeered were those owned by our Jean Landry[#112] and his sons. It must be remembered that members of the more extended Landry family ran a mill; Pierre[#132] ran a Mill up on the upper reaches of the Avon River (as we know it today). And, of course, something -- I suggest of catastrophic proportions -- had to happen so as to make these people leave their lands and possessions behind and drive themselves through the wilderness to the shores of Cape Breton, which, at that time, was French territory.
[33] Duncanson, Newport, Nova Scotia, p. 1.
[34] In addition to seeing Arsenault (p. 1407) see CAR, op. cit., , Part I. p. 35.
[35] See Duncanson's Falmouth, op. cit., , plate 2. Ch I.
[36] Arsenault deals with a son, Joseph (b.1765) at p. 1411, who married at Bécancour.
[37] In addition to seeing Arsenault (p. 1403) see CAR, op. cit., Part I. p. 83.
[38] Arsenault and CAR, ibid.
[39] CAR, op. cit., Part I. p. 84.
[40] CAR, op. cit., Appendix 'B', Part III, pp. 134-7; this is confirmed by Jehn at p. 118.
[41] In addition to seeing Arsenault (p. 1403) see Jehn#1, p. 185.
[42] Arsenault deals with a son, Jean-Baptiste (b.1770) at p. 1411, who married at l'Achigan.
[43] See Arsenault at p. 1403; and see CAR, op. cit., Part I. p. 83. There were a couple of other François' that have shown up, and, as yet, I have not attempted to fit them in. There was a "Francis Landrey & wife aged abt 70 years old" and 3 children who ended up in England in 1757? (See CAR, op. cit., Part III, p. 244.) And another was a François Landry with wife, Marie (with one son) who were at Boston in August of 1763? (CAR, op. cit., Appendix 'B', Part III, pp. 134-7; also, see Jehn at p. 178 & p. 256.)
[44] See Arsenault at both pages, 624 & 1199.
[45] See Arsenault at p. 1208. This Alexis Landry is the only early Landry that is written up in the DCB [Vol. IV (1771-1800), p. 436].
[46] NSHS, vol. 3 (1883), "Winslow's Journal ...", p. 117.
[47] See Arsenault at p. 1202 & p. 2355.
[48] In the Pisiquid area there came into being, in 1722, two parishes; la paroisse de l'Assomption and la paroisse de Sainte-Famille. This came about as a result of an edict from the bishop at Quebec. There had been, prior to this time only the one parish, l'Assomption; but those on the west side of the Avon River (as it is named today) wanted their own church (bridges were unheard of, and the tides were high and the mud deep) disputes broke out amongst the residents, such that the bishop had to step in. Thus, on the Falmouth side (western side) of the river, after 1722, the parish of Sainte-Famille was to be found; on the other side, l'Assomption. There was only the one priest to cover both parishes and he use to say mass on each side of the river on alternative Sundays. I might add, parenthetically, that the records for both of these parishes have both gone missing. (See Duncanson's work, Falmouth, Ch. II, p. 5.)
[49] These children are dealt with by Arsenault at pp. 1209-10. One of them, Joseph (1744-1829), died at Memramcook.
[50] NSHS, vol. 3 (1883), "Winslow's Journal ...", p. 114.
[51] Ibid., p. 109.
[52] Ibid., p. 114.
[53A] Ibid.
[53B] Authoritative sources in Louisiana cite the 1763 census taken at Oxford, Maryland: "Landry Firmin, Elizabeth his wife, Joseph and Saturin, Eleine and Magdeleine."
[53C] The church were the Germain Landry family saw to the birth, marriage and death of their members was that known as La paroisse de l'Assomption de Pisiquid, today an ill kept and deserted lot. L'Assomption was located to the east of the river (Windsor), the side on which this particular Landry family had located their farm. L'Assomption probably was probably constructed around 1700, at a time when there would have been a sufficient population to support it.
[54] In addition to Arsenault (p. 1402) see CAR, op. cit., Part I. p. 97. A correspondent of mine from Weymouth, MA, in writing me about her forebearers, reports that Abraham Landry (#1142) "married Isabelle Blanchard. In 1752, he was widowed and lived at Riviere du Moulin-a-scie, Ile Saint Jean (PEI) with his two sons, Charles and Joseph." Joseph [#11443] was "deported by the British from Ile Saint Jean to Saint-Servan de Saint-Malo, Britanny, France, where he was disembarked, January 23, 1759; married January 26, 1768 at Pleudihen, Britanny, Charlotte Fland, a Frenchwoman." From this union came "Julien-Joseph Landry [#114431], born September 19, 1768, at Pleudihen ..." Julien-Joseph "came to Pomquet, NS, presumably with his parents, in the 1790's; married Anne
Broussard, whose family was also among the Acadians exiled to France." From this union came "Urbain Landry [#1144311], born September, 1813 at Pomquet; baptized at Tracadie;
farmer; married (1st) Tarsile DesLauriers, daughter of Paul Jacquet ... DesLauriers and Marguerite Gerroir of Tracadie; (2nd) Honora Hailey." "Laurent Landry[#11443111], born about 1845; emigrated to Boston, MA; where he was a teamster and a carpenter; married (1st) Adelaide Petipas, daughter of Simon Petipas and Marcelline Paon of Arichat, CB; (2nd)Helene Fougere, daughter of Timothee Fougere and Justine Roy of Harve Boucher, NS (born about 1846)." My correspondent then proceeds to give the names of the five children of Laurence Landry and Ellen; and in turn their children of which she is one.
[55] See Stanley's work, A Man for Two Peoples; also see Acadian Exiles in the Colonies (Jehn#2) and Arsenault at p. 1402.
[56] Stanley, p. 6. That Abraham was a resident of Pisiguit is confirmed by Arsenault (p. 625). Further, the 1714 census shows that the Abraham Landry family was located at Pisiguit, Assomption Parish. On a map originally prepared by the British before 1755, and as is tipped in NSHS, #23 (1936) at p. 78, the homesteads of Abraham, Pierre, and Pierre Jermain were located on the eastern side of the Avon River (up from the modern day community of Windsor) just where the southern branch of the Avon comes into the main river, handy the small modern day village of Windsor Forks. (See also, Duncanson's Falmouth, plate 2, Ch I.)
[57] See Jehn#1, p. 118. Arsenault (p. 612) does not mention René #11, but confirms the other two sons, Pierre & Claude. Arsenault (p. 1405) states there was another son, Jean (1713); who, according to Arsenault, was to be found, in 1759, at Boulogne-en-Mer, France. And, then again, at p. 1408, Arsenault makes reference to Jean, the son of Abraham and Marie, Jean (b. 1723)?
[58] Arsenault deals with the children of Pierre and Anne-Marie at p. 2525.
[59] Arsenault, at p. 2526, deals with three of the boys including Charles (b.1738 [#11521]); they seem to have settled at L'Ascension and Donaldsonville.
[60] See Arsenault at p. 1404 & p. 2521; and see Stanley, p. 6.
[61] Stanley, p. 6.
[62] After the deportation, René (b.c.1732) [#11531], born at Piziquid, was to be found at Restigouche; the rest, it seems, being: Joseph (1733-1797; [#11532]), Anselme (b.1734 [#11533]), Firmin (b.1735 [#11534]), Paul-Marie (b.c.1736 [#11535]), & François-Sébastien (b.1738 [#11536]) -- all settled in the Donaldsonville area.
[63] Arsenault, at p. 2526, deals with three of the boys including Charles (b.1738 [#11521]); they seem to have settled at L'Ascension and Donaldsonville. May, 1998: I have heard from one of the descendants of Alexandre [#1153], Bari Angele Landry of New Orleans, Louisiana, who wrote in part "I show three sons born to them [Alexandre Landry and Ann Flan]- Rene (b.~1732), Firmin (b.~1735), and Paul (b.~1736). Firmin was twice married - the first time to Marie LeBlanc, and the second time in Ascension, Donaldsonville, Louisiana, to Louise Babin (married 2/28/1774). We are descended from their son Pierre Ferdinand Landry, baptized 3/30/1777 in Donaldsonville, LA.
[64] NSHS, vol. 3 (1883), "Winslow's Journal ...", p. 114.
[65] See Arsenault at p. 1409; and see, Stanley, p. 6.
[66] Jehn#2, p. 118.
[67] Arsenault deals with a number of René's children at pp. 2528-9.
[68] There are a number of children which Arsenault lists (p. 1405). While these children fall outside the parameters that I have set for myself; one, Jean-Baptiste, (b.1747 [#11612]) is of some note: since, he married Marie-Josephe Dupuis, at Pisiguit (Windsor), in 1768. Did this Jean-Baptiste got missed in the deportation? Or, did he return from Maryland where, it is seen, his father, Pierre, died in 1756. Incidentally, this Jean-Baptiste Landry eventually settled at Memramcook.
[69] Jehn#1, p. 1.
[70] Arsenault deals with François' & Dorothée's children at pp. 2522 & 2523.
[71] Akins, Selections From The Public Documents, p. 24.
[72] Calnek, op. cit., p. 68.
[73] See Minutes of Council Meeting of September 16th and 17th, 1727, as published by Akins, op. cit., pp. 76-77; see too, MacMechan's Original Minutes of His Majesty's Council at Annapolis Royal, 1720-1739 (NS Archives III), pp. 7, 160-1; also see DCB, vol. II, p. 93.
[74] See CAR, op. cit., Appendix 'B', Part III, pp. 77-81.
[75] While Arsenault (p. 613) thinks it was Madeleine Robichaud; Jehn#1 (p. 217) says it was Madeleine Broussard, and so too does Campbell in her genealogy of the Bourque family (NSHQ, Vol. #10 (1980), Nos. 3 & 4, p. 268.)
[76] See Arsenault. The existence of François is confirmed by another genealogy, "The Bourque Family ..." by Joan Bourque Campbell, at p. 268. (NSHQ, Vol. #10 (1980), Nos. 3 & 4.) Yes, Arsenault lists two Renés; though further on, at pp. 613-4, he proceeds as if there was only the one?
[77] NSHS, vol. 4, p. 88.
[78] See MacMechan's A Calendar of Two Letter-books and One Commission-book in the Possession of the Government of Nova Scotia, 1713-41 (NS Archives II), p. 245.
[79] NS Archives II, p. 224.
[80] HSHS, Vol. #29 (1951), p. 38.
[81] Most impressive credentials, to be a child of the union of a Entremount and of a LaTour: The Entremount and LaTour families were the closest thing to French nobility we could ever find in Acadia.
[82] He is mentioned as being there in 1736; see NS Archives II, p. 107.
[83] Yes, Arsenault lists two Jean Baptistes.
[84] CAR, op. cit., Appendix 'B', Part III, pp. 134-7; also see Jehn#1, p. 175.
[85] NS Archives II, pp. 154-5,193,244 and NS Archives III, pp. 270-1.
[86] See CAR, op. cit., Appendix 'B', Part III, pp. 77-81.
[87] Ibid.; indeed, the name "René Landry" shows up three times on the Oath.
[88] Now, it is entirely possible that our François married both women; but, if he married only one of them, then it likely was Dorothée as the Pierre Landry [#12] family by 1723 had established themselves at Pisiquid (Windsor) and (see Campbell's genealogy of the Bourque family [NSHQ, Vol.: 10 (1980), Nos. 3 & 4, p. 268.] François and Dorothée "lived at Pisiquid."
[89] Jehn#2, p. 118. Arsenault (see pp. 624 & 1198) makes Antoine to be the son of René Landry [#11], I make him out to be the son of René Landry [#1], at this distance, and assuming [#11] to be the son of [#1], it makes little difference.
[90] Jehn#1, p. 83.
[91] NS Archives III, p. 22.
[92] Jehn#1, p. 83.
[93] See CAR, op. cit., Appendix 'B', Part III, pp. 77-81.
[94] NS Archives II, p. 193 and NS Archives III, pp. 270-1.
[95] Arsenault deals with a son, Jean (b.1734) at p. 1562.
[96] NSHS, vol. 3 (1883), "Winslow's Journal ...", p. 114.
[97] Arsenault deals with Alexis' children at p. 1211.
[98] See Arsenault's note at p. 2522 under Pierre (1721).
[99] See Arsenault's note at p. 1406 under Firmin (1725).
[100] See Duncanson's Falmouth, plate 2, Ch I; and see the map originally prepared by the British before 1755, a copy of which is tipped in NSHS, #23 (1936) at p. 78.
[101] HSHS, Vol #29 (1951), p. 38.
[102] Arsenault deal with two of Pierre's children at p. 2529.
[103] Arsenault deals with Pierre's children at pp. 2529-30.
[104] Arsenault deals with Basil's children at p. 2530.
[105] See Arsenault, p. 1199; and see Jehn#1 at p. 83.
[106] NS Archives II, p. 189.
[107] NSHS, vol. 3 (1883), "Winslow's Journal ...", p. 123. On January 31st, 1757, without doubt, François Landry [#133], was located in Ipswick, Massachusetts. "Francois Landrey & wife aged abt 70 years old. Children: Charles Landry, 35 years old; Germain, 30; Ozet, 26 years." And the entry immediately below, "John Landry & Margaret Landry his wife. Children: Mary Landry, 12 years old; Margaret, 10; Nanne, 8; Ozet, 6; Madlin, 4; Frances, 2; John Ipswick, 9 months old." [Canadian Archives Report (CAR); vol. II (Ottawa: S.E. Dawson, 1906), Appendix 'A', p. 244.]
[108] See Arsenault, p. 1204; and see Jehn#1 p. 83 & p. 187.
[109] NSHS, vol. 3 (1883), "Winslow's Journal ...", p. 117.
[110] Jehn#1, p. 99; Arsenault, p. 1200.
[111] Arsenault, in dealing with Jean [#134], at p. 1200, does not list Honoré [#1342], but at p. 1205 says that Honoré [#1342] is the son of Jean [#134].
[112] Arsenault, in dealing with Jean [#134], at p. 1200, does not list René [#1344], but at p. 1205 says that René [#1344] is the son of Jean [#134].
[113] The 1752 census shows that there was a a 51 year old Jean Landry [married to a much younger wife, Maria Lablanche (b.1728)] who immigrated to P.E.I., 1749-50. Our Jean (b.1698 [#134]) is the only one that sort of fits? However, the census makes no reference to Jean's younger children; who, one would think, would still be with him? Reference is made to two young adults with this Jean at P.E.I.: Charles Landry (b.1733), his nephew; and Théodose Boudrot (b.1733), his niece.
[114] Arsenault deals with Antoine's children at p. 1009.
[115] Arsenault deals with Honoré's children at pp. 1009-10.
[116] See Arsenault, p. 1206; also see Jehn#1, p. 99 & p. 184.
[117] Arsenault deals with Joseph's children at p. 1212.
[118] See Arsenault, p. 1206; also see Jehn#1, p. 99 & p. 181.
[119] Arsenault deals with Paul's children at p. 1212.
[120] See Arsenault, p. 1206; also see Jehn#1, p. 99 & p. 185.
[121] See NSHQ, Vol.: 10 (1980), Nos. 3 & 4, "The Bourque Family .
.." by Joan Bourque Campbell, pp. 255-71,268.
[122] See CAR, op. cit., Appendix 'B', Part III, p. 76.
[123] CAR, op. cit., Appendix 'B', Part III, pp. 134-7; also, see Jehn <#1>, p. 175 & p. 180.
_______________________________[UP]
Peter Landry
2011 (2020)